How does this change affect premises liability cases in Michigan?

With the abolition of the "open and obvious" doctrine, courts will now assess:

• Whether the property owner owed a duty to the injured party.
• If the property owner breached that duty.
• The nature of the hazardous condition.
• The actions taken by the owner to address or warn about the hazard.
• The comparative fault of both parties involved.

This comprehensive analysis allows for a more nuanced determination of liability.

How does Michigan's comparative fault law interact with this change?

Under Michigan's comparative fault law, if an injured party is found to be more than 50% at fault for their injury, they cannot recover non-economic damages like pain and suffering but can still recover economic damages. This ruling emphasizes a balanced assessment of fault between property owners and injured individuals.

How can Marko Law assist with premises liability cases following this change?

At Marko Law, we stay abreast of legal developments to provide informed representation. If you've been injured on someone else's property or are a property owner facing a premises liability claim, our experienced attorneys can help navigate the complexities of the law, assess the merits of your case, and advocate on your behalf.

For personalized legal guidance, contact Marko Law at (313) 777-7LAW to schedule a consultation.

‍