Police encounters can escalate in seconds—even when the person is elderly, unarmed, or genuinely confused. That’s the reality, and pretending otherwise is how communities get hurt. When a 74-year-old ends up tased or tackled, it forces an uncomfortable question: if that can happen to them, what’s stopping it from happening to anyone?

Accountability matters here—because power without accountability is dangerous. And one of the biggest traps in misconduct cases is the way departments hide behind language like “policy,” “procedure,” or “training.” Let’s be clear: policy is not the same thing as lawful conduct. A department can claim its officer followed internal guidelines and still violate someone’s constitutional rights. An officer can say a tactic is “approved” and still use it in a way that’s reckless, unnecessary, or excessive under the circumstances.

When the person on the receiving end is elderly, the stakes are even higher. A taser isn’t “just a taser” when it causes a fall and a head injury. A tackle isn’t “just a takedown” when it breaks bones, triggers internal bleeding, or causes a catastrophic brain injury. And “noncompliance” isn’t a magic word that turns violence into something acceptable—especially when the “noncompliance” is really confusion, disability, fear, or slow movement.

What Police Misconduct Can Look Like

Police misconduct includes actions that violate constitutional rights, department policy, or basic standards of safety and decency. Sometimes it’s obvious. Sometimes it’s hidden behind official language like “officer safety,” “resisted,” or “noncompliant.” But the impact is the same: a person is harmed, and the system tries to justify it.

Common forms of misconduct

• Excessive force: taser deployments, tackles, baton strikes, K9 bites, chokeholds, or “pile-ons” where multiple officers compress someone on the ground.
• Unlawful stops, detentions, or arrests: being held without a legal basis, handcuffed “just because,” or arrested on charges that don’t match what actually happened.
• Escalation of low-level situations into violence: turning a misunderstanding, minor issue, or slow response into force.
• Retaliation for questioning or filming: hostility, threats, seizure of phones, or arrest threats because someone asked what was happening or recorded from a safe distance.
• Failure to provide medical care after force: ignoring complaints of injury, refusing EMS, delaying treatment, or treating obvious medical distress like “attitude.”

Your Civil Rights: The Legal Standards That Actually Matter

The constitutional rights most often implicated

• Fourth Amendment: protects against unreasonable seizures and excessive force.
• Fourteenth Amendment: can apply in certain contexts involving due process and equal protection issues.

What courts often consider

• How serious was the alleged offense? A low-level issue doesn’t justify high-level violence.
• Was there an immediate threat—real, not assumed? “I felt threatened” isn’t the same as an actual threat.
• Was the person actively resisting—or simply confused, slow, scared, or medically impaired? This matters enormously with older adults.
• Did officers try de-escalation and safer alternatives? Some situations call for patience, distance, and communication—not pain compliance.

The civil rights pathway

Many police misconduct cases are brought as federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which allows people to pursue accountability when a government actor violates constitutional rights.

What To Do If Police Used Force on You or a Loved One

Prioritize medical care

• Get evaluated right away—especially after taser exposure, a fall, head impact, restraint, or chest compression.
• Document symptoms that show up later: headaches, dizziness, confusion, chest pain, shortness of breath, numbness, memory problems.
• Tell providers what happened and make sure it’s in the medical record.

Preserve evidence fast

• Save clothing (cuts, blood, taser punctures, torn fabric can matter).
• Take clear photos of injuries over time (same angle/lighting if possible).
• Keep discharge paperwork, prescriptions, and follow-up instructions.
• Identify witnesses and get statements early—people disappear, memories fade.
• Record your recollection while it’s fresh:
  
  • timeline
  • exact words said
  • threats made
  • requests for medical help
  • what you did (and didn’t) do

Secure video before it disappears

Video is often the difference between a denial and accountability.

• Body cam/dash cam can be overwritten.
• Nearby business or residential footage can be deleted in days.
• If bystanders recorded, request the original file, not a reposted version.

Be careful with statements

• Don’t let an insurance adjuster, city investigator, or “friendly” caller shape your narrative.
• Don’t post everything online immediately. Public posts can be edited, misframed, or used against you—protect the integrity of the case first.

Reporting vs. Accountability: What Complaints Can and Can’t Do

Internal affairs complaints

Internal affairs is often:

• Slow
• Defensive
• Built to protect the department’s narrative

That doesn’t mean it’s useless. It can be valuable for one reason: record-building. A complaint can lock in dates, names, incident numbers, and confirm the department was put on notice. But don’t confuse “we received your complaint” with “we’re going to do the right thing.”

Civilian oversight (where applicable)

Some cities have civilian review boards or oversight bodies. These can:

• Apply public pressure
• Create documentation
• Raise issues that departments prefer to bury

But in many cases, oversight entities lack real enforcement power—meaning they can recommend discipline without being able to force it. They can highlight a problem, but not always fix it.

Damages: What Victims May Be Entitled To Recover

Medical expenses

• ER visits, hospitalization, surgery
• Rehab and physical therapy
• Medication and follow-up treatment
• Assistive devices (walkers, braces, wheelchairs)
• Home modifications (ramps, rails, accessibility updates)

Pain and suffering

• Physical pain from injuries and recovery
• Emotional trauma: anxiety, nightmares, fear of leaving home, loss of security

Loss of independence

This one hits hardest for seniors.

• Reduced mobility
• Inability to live alone
• Loss of enjoyment of life
• Loss of dignity—when a person goes from independent to dependent overnight

Lost income / caregiver costs

• Lost wages for the injured person (if still working)
• Lost wages for family members who must take time off to provide care
• Out-of-pocket caregiver expenses, transportation, and home assistance

Wrongful death damages

When force leads to fatal injuries, families may have claims tied to:

• the loss of their loved one
• the financial and emotional impact of that death
• the support and companionship that was taken away

How Marko Law Builds Police Misconduct Cases

Immediate evidence preservation

We take swift action to demand retention of:

• body cam and dash cam footage
• dispatch audio and 911 calls
• CAD logs and run sheets
• incident reports and use-of-force paperwork

Because the truth shouldn’t “expire” on a retention schedule.

Medical and expert strategy

Misconduct cases aren’t just about what officers did—they’re about what it did to the human body and the human life that body belongs to.

We work to connect force to:

• injuries
• long-term disability
• chronic pain
• neurological harm
• loss of independence—especially for older adults who are medically vulnerable

Accountability-focused litigation

We pursue:

• individual liability when an officer made the choices that caused harm
• and when supported by evidence, department or city responsibility tied to training, policies, supervision, and repeated failures

Because misconduct is rarely “one bad moment” in a vacuum.

Trial-ready posture

Some firms build cases to settle. We build cases to win.

We prepare every case like it’s going to a jury—because that’s where truth has weight, excuses get tested, and accountability becomes real.

Force Isn’t “Justified” Because Someone Got Hurt

If you’re outraged by an elderly person being met with violence instead of care, that reaction is rational. It means you still recognize the difference between public safety and public harm. It means you understand what too many institutions try to normalize: age, confusion, slowness, or vulnerability should never be treated like a threat.

Here’s the core truth: police are not above the Constitution. “Policy” doesn’t erase rights. A badge doesn’t excuse brutality. And the fact that someone ended up injured doesn’t magically make the force “reasonable.” In far too many cases, the injury is the evidence that something went wrong—something unnecessary, excessive, or reckless.

Contact Marko Law for a Free Case Evaluation

At Marko Law, we fight hard—and we don’t back down. If you or someone you love was tased, tackled, or brutalized—especially if they’re elderly or vulnerable—don’t let the system bury it. Let’s talk.

📞 Phone: +1-313-777-7777
📍 Main Office: 220 W. Congress, 4th Floor, Detroit, MI 48226
🌐 Website: www.markolaw.com