When a semi-truck causes a crash on I-94 or I-75, most people assume there's one company to blame: the one whose logo is on the door. But modern trucking rarely works that way. A single load might pass through a shipper, a broker, a dispatcher, and a carrier before it ever hits the road.
That layered structure isn't an accident. It often exists to spread out responsibility and make it harder for injured families to figure out who actually failed them. We've seen firsthand how that confusion keeps people from pursuing claims they may be entitled to bring.
Who's Actually in the Supply Chain (And Why It Matters After a Crash)
Motor Carriers vs. Brokers vs. Freight Forwarders
A motor carrier is the company that physically moves the freight, usually the one that owns or leases the truck and employs the driver. A freight broker doesn't own trucks at all. Instead, a broker connects shippers who need freight moved with carriers willing to move it, earning a fee for the match.
A freight forwarder sits somewhere in between. Forwarders often take on more logistical responsibility, including consolidating shipments or coordinating multiple legs of a route. Each role carries different legal duties, and each can carry different exposure after a crash.
Why Modern Trucking Involves Layers of Companies, Not Just a Driver
Digital load boards and brokerage platforms have made it easier than ever to outsource freight to whichever carrier bids lowest. That efficiency comes with a cost. Brokers sometimes prioritize speed and price over safety records when selecting who hauls a load.
- A single shipment can pass through two or three companies before reaching the final carrier
- Many of these companies never directly supervise the driver who ends up behind the wheel
- Paperwork identifying each party is often scattered across broker platforms, not held by any single source
Only the truck driver or trucking company can be held responsible for a crash.
Depending on the circumstances, brokers, forwarders, and other logistics companies may share legal responsibility if their own negligence contributed to the crash.
How Freight Brokers Can Be Held Legally Responsible
Negligent Hiring and Selection of Unsafe Carriers
Brokers have a responsibility to use reasonable care when choosing which carrier hauls a load. A broker that ignores a carrier's poor safety history, or skips basic vetting altogether, may be negligent in how it selected that carrier. That negligence can become part of a victim's claim.
The Supreme Court's 2026 Ruling in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II
For years, freight brokers argued that federal law (the FAAAA) shielded them from state negligent hiring claims entirely. Federal courts were split on the question, and some injured victims were turned away before their case even got started.
That changed in May 2026. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC that negligent hiring and selection claims against freight brokers are not preempted by the FAAAA. The Court held that a broker's decision about which carrier to hire "concerns" motor vehicle safety, placing these claims inside the Act's safety exception.
What "Red Flags" Look Like in a Broker's Records
Brokers have access to information that can reveal whether a carrier was unsafe before a load was ever assigned. Ignoring that information is where liability often starts.
- A carrier's FMCSA safety rating or history of out-of-service violations
- Lapsed or insufficient insurance coverage at the time of dispatch
- A documented pattern of prior crashes, citations, or driver complaints
Negligent Hiring Claims Against Trucking Companies Themselves
Duty to Vet Drivers Before Putting Them on the Road
Trucking companies carry their own independent duty to check a driver's background before hiring them. That includes confirming a valid commercial driver's license, reviewing driving history, and conducting required drug and alcohol testing. Skipping these steps to fill a seat faster can amount to negligence.
Common Warning Signs Companies Ignore
Some of the clearest evidence in these cases comes from what a company already knew and chose to overlook.
- Prior at-fault crashes or repeated traffic violations on a driver's record
- FMCSA violations tied to hours-of-service or vehicle maintenance
- Inadequate or rushed training before a driver was cleared for solo routes
How This Overlaps With (But Differs From) Broker Liability
A trucking company's failure to vet its own driver is a separate legal question from a broker's failure to vet the trucking company. Both can exist in the same crash. In many of these cases, the strongest claims hold multiple companies accountable for different failures at different points in the chain.
Third-Party Logistics Lawsuits: When Multiple Companies Share Blame
Shippers, Dispatchers, and Logistics Coordinators as Additional Defendants
Brokers and carriers aren't the only companies that can end up as defendants. Shippers who pressured unsafe delivery timelines, or dispatchers who ignored hours-of-service violations, may also share responsibility. Identifying every involved party takes real investigative work.
Why These Cases Often Involve More Than One Insurance Policy
Each company in the chain typically carries its own liability coverage. That means a crash involving a broker, a carrier, and a shipper may open up multiple policies rather than just one. For a seriously injured family, that can directly affect what full and fair compensation looks like.
The Investigative Work Behind Naming the Right Parties
Figuring out which companies belong in a lawsuit takes time and resources most people don't have access to on their own. Our team pulls broker-carrier agreements, dispatch records, and federal safety data to map out exactly who made which decisions. That groundwork is often what separates a case naming one defendant from a case that holds everyone accountable.
What We Pull Early in These Cases
- Broker-carrier contracts and load confirmation paperwork
- FMCSA SAFER system records and SMS safety scores for the carrier
- Dispatch logs, communications, and assignment history
- Certificates of insurance for every company in the chain
Why These Cases Are Harder Than a Standard Car Accident Claim
Federal Regulations Layered on Top of Michigan Law
Trucking crashes sit at the intersection of Michigan negligence law and federal motor carrier regulations. Both bodies of law affect what a company was required to do, and both matter in proving fault. Few personal injury claims require this much regulatory knowledge.
Corporate Structures Designed to Limit Liability
Some logistics companies deliberately structure their relationships with carriers to look like they have no control over safety decisions. That structure can make it harder, though not impossible, to connect a broker's conduct to a crash. Experienced counsel knows how to look past the paperwork to the actual decisions that were made.
Evidence That Disappears Fast
Electronic logging device data, dispatch communications, and internal broker records don't stay available forever. Some companies only retain this data for a matter of months. Moving quickly after a crash can be the difference between having that evidence and losing it.
What Injured Victims and Families Should Do Right Away
Preserving Evidence Before It's Gone
A formal evidence preservation request, sometimes called a litigation hold letter, can stop companies from destroying records tied to the crash. The sooner this happens, the more complete the eventual case file is likely to be.
Why Early Legal Involvement Changes the Outcome
Waiting to speak with an attorney often means losing access to the exact records that prove broker or carrier negligence. Getting legal representation early allows that evidence-gathering to start immediately, not months later.
Quick Questions We Hear Often
Can I sue a broker if they never owned the truck?
In many cases, yes, if the broker's own negligence in selecting the carrier contributed to the crash.
What if I already spoke with the trucking company's insurer?
Speak with an attorney before signing anything or accepting an offer, since early settlements can affect your rights.
Does this apply to loads subcontracted through large retailers or shipping companies?
It can. Every case is different, and the parties involved depend on the specific facts.
The Company You Never Heard Of Can Still Owe You Answers
Most injured families have never heard the words "freight broker" before their crash. That doesn't mean the broker's decisions didn't help put an unsafe truck on the road. Every company that played a role in that decision deserves scrutiny, not a free pass because its name wasn't printed on the truck.
Holding the full chain accountable takes investigation, regulatory knowledge, and a willingness to go after every responsible party, not just the easiest one. That's the work that actually changes outcomes for Michigan families.
Let's Find Out Who Else Is Responsible
If you or someone you love was hurt in a Michigan trucking accident, the company at fault may extend well beyond the driver. You don't have to untangle broker agreements, dispatch records, or federal safety data on your own.
Contact Marko Law today for a free case evaluation.
Related reading
- Truck Accidents Caused by Improperly Secured Loads on I-75 and I-96
- When a Trucking Company's Insurance Isn't Enough: Michigan Excess Coverage Claims
- Michigan Truck Accident Depositions: What to Expect When You're Injured by a Commercial Driver
- Tanker Truck Rollovers and Spills on Michigan Highways: Legal Rights for Victims
- Black Box Data in Truck Accident Cases
- Trucking Company Liability After Serious Crashes
Free case evaluation
Talk to a Marko Law trial attorney today
Detroit, MI 48226
Every case is different. Speak to a lawyer to understand your rights.

Practice Areas
Our experienced attorneys handle a wide range of legal matters, from catastrophic personal injury to civil rights violations and workplace discrimination. Whether you have been hurt in a car accident, mistreated by your employer, or had your privacy violated, we are here to fight for your justice.
Tell us about your legal situation today. Your consultation is free, and your voice deserves to be heard.Marko Law Will Give You A Voice
At Marko Law, we don’t just take cases. we take a stand. Whether you're facing an injury, injustice, or outright negligence, our team fights like it’s personal, because to you, it is.
- Over $2 Billion recovered for our clients
- Proven track record in civil rights, personal injury & workplace justice
- Free, confidential consultations. you don’t pay unless we win
- Based in Detroit, Michigan; trusted Nationwide
Ready to make your voice heard?
We’re not here to play games. We’re here to win.
